AG百家乐大转轮-AG百家乐导航_怎么看百家乐走势_全讯网官网 (中国)·官方网站

Research News

An important progress on the mechanisms for global plant distribution was made by Prof. Shaolin Peng’s team at the School of Life Sciences

Source: School of Life Sciences
Edited by: Tan Rongyu, Wang Dongmei

CSR-strategic scheme was proposed by the famous UK ecologist, Dr. Philip Grime, to describe the triangular trade-off between three important plant functional strategies, competitor (C), stress tolerator (S) and ruderal (R). These three strategies may benefit plant range expansion under different circumstances. However, how the three strategies influence the extent of plant global distribution remains to be explored. The recent study entitled “The role of functional strategies in global plant distribution” by Prof. Shaolin Peng’s team at the School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University provides an answer to this important question (Fig. 1a) and directly compared the difference in the dominant functional strategies influencing plant distributions in the native and naturalized ranges (Fig. 1b).



Fig. 1. The theoretical background for the potentially different dominant functional strategies dictating the native, naturalized, and global distributions of plant species. (a) The effects of major ecological factors on the species distribution in the native, naturalized, and global distributional ranges. The question marks denote the areas that have not been tested yet. (b) The colonization and dominance processes associated with the ruderal (R), competitor (C) and stress-tolerator (S) strategies. The question marks denote the processes whose outcomes depend on the functional strategies of the focal species.

In this study, a dataset of 2645 vascular plant species was compiled to explore the roles of the CSR strategies in global plant distribution. The functional strategy-range size associations differed across different distributional ranges and growth forms. Specifically, species global and native range sizes were positively associated with the R score; species naturalized range size was positively associated with the C score; and all range-size measurements were negatively associated with the S score (Fig. 2). These patterns were mostly driven by herbs but not shrubs or trees. For species global and native-range distributions, the patterns of shrubs were even opposite to those of herbs (Fig. 2). These findings suggest that although the native range size is a strong indicator of the invasion success of a species, we may overestimate the invasion potential of ruderal trees and herbs solely based on their native range sizes because the R strategy has a greater advantage in the native range than in the naturalized range for these species. Along the same lines, we may underestimate the invasion potential of the C-selected native herbs, because the C strategy has a greater advantage in the naturalized range than in the native range.


Fig. 2. Effect of the C/S/R score on the three range-size measurements, (a) global range size, (b) native range size and (c) naturalized range size, for each growth form based on the phylogenetic generalized least square (PGLS) models. Estimates for the effects with standard errors are shown. The estimates that are significantly different from zero are marked by asterisks (* P≤0.05; ** P≤0.01; and *** P≤0.001).
 
More importantly, these findings emphasize the importance of distinguishing the functional strategies associated with native and non-native species to provide better guidance for nature conservation. Because narrow-ranging native plants usually possess a weak R strategy (i.e., a weak dispersal ability), there is a high possibility of conserving these species by increasing propagule pressures and aiding dispersal to distant habitats. Meanwhile, because non-native herbs suggest that the wide-ranging (highly invasive) herbs in the naturalized range usually possess a strong C strategy and a weak S strategy (i.e., a strong competitiveness and a weak stress tolerance), there is a high possibility of controlling these species by enhancing the resistance of resident community via plant diversity manipulation and restrict disturbances that will alleviate resource limitation in natural communities.

This work was published in Ecography (IF=6.455, JCR=Q1), which was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (China) and the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources (China). Prof. Shaolin Peng is the corresponding author, and Dr. Huixuan Liao is the first author of this paper.

Link to the paper: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.05476
bet365金融| 百家乐网络赌博网| 金龙棋牌下载| 乐百家乐官网彩娱乐城| 百家乐咨询网址| 白金会娱乐场怎么样| 中国百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则| 百家乐太阳娱乐网| 试玩百家乐官网网| 大发888娱乐免费试玩| 百家乐官网天天乐娱乐场| 真博百家乐的玩法技巧和规则| 赌博百家乐官网下载| 网上百家乐真坑人| 澳门百家乐官网官网www.bjbj100.com| 专业的百家乐玩家| 怎样玩百家乐官网才能| 顶级赌场连环夺宝下载| 宝马百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 百家乐可以算牌么| 澳门百家乐官网门路| 百家乐五星宏辉怎么玩| 赌百家乐官网可以赢钱| 新全讯| 澳门百家乐| 百家乐官网博娱乐赌百家乐官网的玩法技巧和规则 | 百家乐十赌九诈| 百家乐官网真人游戏投注网| 百家乐打水套利| 百家乐官网透视牌靴| 百家乐投资| 威尼斯人娱乐城信誉最好| 微信百家乐官网群规则大全| 旅游| 永利高投注网哪个好| 百家乐连开6把小| 澳门百家乐官网开户投注| 时时博娱乐城评级| 网上的百家乐怎么才能| 玩百家乐怎么才能赢| 属狗与属猪能做生意吗|